February
Other strong months: January and March
Puerto Rico · 1991–2020
For Coto Laurel, February has the most comfortable weather in our climate comparison. Typical daytime highs are 30.9°C, nights average 18.5°C, and rainfall totals about 33 mm. Figures use measured 1991–2020 normals from the nearest eligible NOAA station.
Other strong months: January and March
Other strong months: February and December
Other strong months: January and March
Make the answer personal
Set the daytime temperature and rainfall you are comfortable with. We will show only the months that meet every choice, using the measured 1991–2020 averages below.
7 months fit your choices for Coto Laurel
September has the lowest comfort score at 32 out of 100, compared with February at 70. The main reason is that days average 33.1°C, 9° above the 24°C the score treats as ideal, and 170 mm of rain falls.
Quick answers
These answers come from the same measured monthly climate record shown on this page.
February is the strongest all-round choice in our temperature-and-rainfall comparison, with a typical daytime high of 30.9°C and 33 mm of rain.
August is hottest in this record, with a typical daytime high of 33.4°C and a night-time low of 22.4°C.
January has the lowest monthly rainfall total at 21 mm.
No. These are long-term measured averages from 1991–2020. Check a current forecast before you travel.
Month by month
The bars combine daytime temperature, night-time temperature and rainfall. The figures are measured historical averages, not a forecast for a particular trip.
| Month | Day | Night | Rain | Wet days | Sea | Daylight | Comfort | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | 31.1°C | 18.8°C | 21 mm | 4.4 | 26.8°C | 11 h 09 | 69 | Strong coverage |
| February | 30.9°C | 18.5°C | 33 mm | 4.4 | 26.5°C | 11 h 32 | 70 | Strong coverage |
| March | 30.9°C | 18.8°C | 47 mm | 5.9 | 26.5°C | 11 h 59 | 66 | Strong coverage |
| April | 31.4°C | 20°C | 66 mm | 6.5 | 27.1°C | 12 h 32 | 59 | Strong coverage |
| May | 31.9°C | 21.4°C | 102 mm | 7.6 | 27.7°C | 12 h 58 | 49 | Strong coverage |
| June | 32.8°C | 22.5°C | 52 mm | 5.6 | 28.2°C | 13 h 12 | 53 | Strong coverage |
| July | 33.2°C | 22.4°C | 69 mm | 6.6 | 28.4°C | 13 h 07 | 48 | Strong coverage |
| August | 33.4°C | 22.4°C | 118 mm | 8.2 | 28.8°C | 12 h 44 | 39 | Strong coverage |
| September | 33.1°C | 22.2°C | 170 mm | 10 | 29.1°C | 12 h 13 | 32 | Strong coverage |
| October | 32.7°C | 21.8°C | 137 mm | 10.5 | 29.0°C | 11 h 42 | 38 | Strong coverage |
| November | 32.2°C | 20.8°C | 97 mm | 8.6 | 28.5°C | 11 h 16 | 49 | Good coverage |
| December | 31.6°C | 19.3°C | 38 mm | 4.8 | 27.6°C | 11 h 03 | 65 | Strong coverage |
What has changed
Each bar shows the difference between the 2011–2025 average daytime high and the 1961–1990 average for the same month at the same station. A blank month does not have enough older observations for a reliable comparison.
| Month | Record high | Record low | Wettest day | Wettest / driest month | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | 36.7°C30 Jan 2019 | 9.4°C24 Jan 1993 | 66 mm10 Jan 1958 | 130 mm1930 · driest 0 mm in 1928 | 112 |
| February | 35.0°C11 Feb 1948 | 10.6°C28 Feb 2004 | 94 mm3 Feb 1935 | 222 mm1935 · driest 0 mm in 1903 | 112 |
| March | 35.6°C14 Mar 2016 | 10.0°C18 Mar 2008 | 50 mm13 Mar 1989 | 187 mm1989 · driest 0 mm in 2005 | 110 |
| April | 35.6°C13 Apr 1996 | 11.7°C2 Apr 1995 | 144 mm27 Apr 1943 | 283 mm1943 · driest 1 mm in 1907 | 113 |
| May | 35.6°C26 May 1998 | 12.8°C2 May 2013 | 199 mm26 May 1945 | 472 mm1992 · driest 2 mm in 2021 | 115 |
| June | 37.2°C14 Jun 1993 | 15.6°C12 Jun 2017 | 122 mm8 Jun 1900 | 424 mm1900 · driest 0 mm in 1904 | 115 |
| July | 37.8°C16 Jul 2019 | 14.4°C5 Jul 2012 | 165 mm19 Jul 1979 | 246 mm1979 · driest 0 mm in 1905 | 111 |
| August | 37.8°C21 Aug 2003 | 15.6°C31 Aug 2010 | 228 mm23 Aug 2001 | 437 mm1909 · driest 5 mm in 2015 | 113 |
| September | 37.8°C7 Sep 2021 | 15.0°C1 Sep 2010 | 327 mm18 Sep 2000 | 595 mm2008 · driest 6 mm in 2015 | 108 |
| October | 36.7°C6 Oct 1944 | 16.1°C18 Oct 2008 | 193 mm8 Oct 1912 | 507 mm1990 · driest 7 mm in 1965 | 108 |
| November | 37.8°C28 Nov 2016 | 13.3°C10 Nov 1969 | 136 mm14 Nov 2003 | 374 mm1938 · driest 1 mm in 2025 | 108 |
| December | 36.7°C1 Dec 2016 | 11.1°C18 Dec 2004 | 122 mm3 Dec 1960 | 212 mm1960 · driest 0 mm in 1927 | 114 |
| Month | Days 25°C+ | Days 30°C+ | Heavy rain (10 mm+) |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 30 | 26 | <1 |
| February | 27 | 23 | <1 |
| March | 29 | 26 | 1 |
| April | 28 | 27 | 2 |
| May | 30 | 29 | 2 |
| June | 28 | 28 | 2 |
| July | 28 | 28 | 2 |
| August | 28 | 28 | 3 |
| September | 28 | 27 | 3 |
| October | 29 | 29 | 4 |
| November | 28 | 27 | 3 |
| December | 28 | 26 | <1 |
The best month has moved. On the 1961–1990 numbers the strongest month here was January (scoring 73); on 2011–2025 it is February (72). Both are scored the same way, from the same station — only the climate underneath changed.
| Month | Dry days reaching 20°C | Wet days | Days with heavy rain | Weeks with 3+ wet days | Typical high by year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | 87% | 13% | 2% | 9% | 28.9–31.5°C |
| February | 86% | 14% | 2% | 10% | 29.2–31.3°C |
| March | 85% | 15% | 3% | 11% | 29.4–31.5°C |
| April | 81% | 19% | 5% | 18% | 30.0–31.8°C |
| May | 75% | 25% | 8% | 29% | 30.4–32.3°C |
| June | 80% | 20% | 7% | 18% | 31.0–33.1°C |
| July | 80% | 20% | 6% | 18% | 31.7–33.5°C |
| August | 74% | 26% | 10% | 31% | 31.7–33.8°C |
| September | 69% | 31% | 12% | 39% | 31.5–33.5°C |
| October | 66% | 34% | 13% | 42% | 31.0–33.3°C |
| November | 73% | 27% | 9% | 28% | 30.5–32.7°C |
| December | 86% | 14% | 3% | 8% | 29.7–32.2°C |
A dry day reaching 20°C records under 1 mm of rain. A wet day records at least 1 mm, while a heavy-rain day records at least 10 mm. The weekly figure is the share of seven-day periods containing three or more wet days. The final column shows the middle 80% of average daytime highs recorded for that month in individual years; a wider range means conditions have varied more from one year to another.
The evidence behind this page
Next step
The weather comparison for Coto Laurel is based on climate evidence, not payments from travel companies. Flight, accommodation and activity links will be clearly labelled when they are added; there are no booking offers on this page today.
How travel partnerships will work